Wednesday, 24 September 2014

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS THEORY


DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS theory
The concept of diffusion of innovations usually refers to the spread of ideas from one society to another or from a focus or institution within a society to other parts of that society. Diffusion is the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system (Rogers, 2003). An innovation is an idea, practice, or object perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption. The diffusion process typically involves both mass media and interpersonal communication channels. And, in today’s world, information technologies such as the Internet and cell phones – which combine aspects of mass media and interpersonal channels, represent formidable tools of diffusion (Morris & Ogan, 1996).

The study of the diffusion of innovations in its present-day form can be traced from the theories and observations of Gabriel Tarde, a French sociologist and legal scholar (Rogers, 2003). Tarde originated such key diffusion concepts as opinion leadership, the S-curve of diffusion, and the role of socioeconomic status in interpersonal diffusion, although he did not use such concepts by these names. Such theoretical ideas were set forth by Tarde (1903) in his book, The Laws of Imitation.

The basic research paradigm for the diffusion of innovations can be traced to Bryce Ryan and Neal C. Gross’s classic 1943 study of the diffusion of hybrid seed corn among Iowa farmers. This investigation was grounded in previously conducted anthropological diffusion work, which Ryan had studied while earning his doctoral degree at Harvard University, prior to becoming a faculty member in rural sociology at Iowa State University, where Gross was a graduate student.

During the 1950s many diffusion studies were conducted, particularly by rural sociologists at land-grant universities in the midwestern United States. They were directly influenced by the Ryan and Gross investigation. As soon as communication study began to be institutionalized, this new breed of scholars became especially interested in the diffusion of news events, particularly through an influential study by Paul J. Deutschmann and Wayne A. Danielson (1960).

Four Main Elements in the Diffusion of Innovations
Ø  Innovation
Rogers offered the following description of an innovation: “An innovation is an idea, practice, or project that is perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption” (Rogers, 2003, p. 12).  The newness characteristic of an adoption is more related to the three steps (knowledge, persuasion, and decision) of the innovation-decision process.

Ø  Communication Channels
For Rogers (2003), communication is “a process in which participants create and share information with one another in order to reach a mutual understanding” (p. 5). This communication occurs through channels between sources. Rogers states that diffusion is a specific kind of communication and includes these communication elements: an innovation, two individuals or other units of adoption, and a communication channel. Mass media and interpersonal communication are two communication channels. While mass media channels include a mass medium such as TV, radio, or newspaper, interpersonal channels consist of a two-way communication between two or more individuals.

Ø  Time
According to Rogers (2003), the time aspect is ignored in most behavioral research. He argues that including the time dimension in diffusion research illustrates one of its strengths. The innovation-diffusion process, adopter categorization, and rate of adoptions all include a time dimension.


Ø  Social System
Rogers (2003) defined the social system as “a set of interrelated units engaged in joint problem solving to accomplish a common goal” (p. 23). Since diffusion of innovations takes place in the social system, it is influenced by the social structure of the social system.

The Innovation-Decision Process
Rogers (2003) described the innovation-decision process as “an information-seeking and information-processing activity, where an individual is motivated to reduce uncertainty about the advantages and disadvantages of an innovation” (p. 172). For Rogers (2003), the innovation-decision process involves five steps: (1) knowledge, (2) persuasion, (3) decision, (4) implementation, and (5) confirmation.
Attributes of Innovations and Rate of Adoption
Rogers (2003) described the innovation-diffusion process as “an uncertainty reduction process” (p. 232), and he proposes attributes of innovations that help to decrease uncertainty about the innovation. Attributes of innovations includes five characteristics of innovations: (1) relative advantage, (2) compatibility, (3) complexity, (4) trialability, and (5) observability. The rate at which people adopt innovations appears to be normally distributed. Rogers categorized adopters as follows:  (1) Innovators    (2) Early adopters      (3) Early majority       (4) Late majority and laggards.

Diffusion of innovations permits culture to evolve more rapidly than would be possible if each society had to evolve their own innovations. The acquisition of ideas from other societies is extremely important to the evolution of complex adaptive strategies.

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

STREETISM IN ACCRA The problem of streetism is complex and the situation has been with us over the years. Streetism basically means living on the street as a result of lack of housing accommodation coupled with the difficulty to cater for themselves. The negligence of some parents to take good care of their children is gradually breeding more street children in Accra. The problem of street children can also be attributed to poverty, wrong perception of city life, peer pressure, just to mention a few. Day in day out there are children on the streets who engage in one form of work or the other. Some are seen selling ice water, commonly known as pure water, while others as head porters. These children are exposed to various forms of abuse. Their safety is compromised because there is on one to rise to their defense in times of difficulty. I shall discuss these abuses in my following articles Over the years successive governments and other agencies have done their bit to curtail this menace. However, this has not yield the desired result. This is evident in the number of children on the street and the challenges they go through. This situation is very worrying and calls for a redoubling of efforts to fight this menace. The government, as well as Non-Governmental Agencies should step up efforts to fight this menace.
STREETISM IN ACCRA The problem of streetism is complex and the situation has been with us over the years. Streetism basically means living on the street as a result of lack of housing accommodation coupled with the difficulty to cater for themselves. This blog is about research that seeks to identify the category of children who are on the streets, causes of streetism, the challenges the children come face to face with, the agencies responsible for addressing issues related to streetism and finally find possible solution to address them.